jump to navigation

PURPLE MIND – IMPOSING SANCTIONS 07/19/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

A week or so ago I wrote in the “Purple Mind” pages about the chain of events leading from George W. Bush issuing National Security Presidential Directive 24, which essentially made Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Military.  Thanks to Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz, a plan was put in place to disenfranchise the Iraqi Government and Military, firing hundreds of thousands of government employees including civil servants, teachers and doctors as well as the entire Iraqi Army, taking away their jobs and incomes and leaving half a million pissed off and armed men on the street with nothing to do but hate Americans.  It was a great way to start a vicious insurgency which would fuel America’s war with Iraq for the next ten years.

What I failed to mention was that between the end of the Gulf War in 1990 and our invasion of Iraq in 2003, the United Nations had enforced sanctions on Iraq preventing the country from doing anything other than buying food and medicines through the “Oil for Food Program.”

Whistleblower Susan Lindauer, who worked as a CIA asset and private intermediary between the U.S. and Iraq during the years leading up to the invasion,  has written extensively about the result of the sanctions imposed on Iraq by the U.N..

“The World Health Organization reported that 500,000 children had died by the end of 1996, raising alarms that the U.N. sanctions had become a policy of ‘mass death.’  The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) acknowledged that in state-controlled areas of Iraq, the mortality rate of children under the age of 5 had more than doubled in 10 years.
“Officially, UNICEF estimated that between 5,000 and 7,000 children under age 5 died each month.  However, the Iraqi Health Ministry published statistics averaging 11,000 dead each month in 2000, much higher than the United Nations wanted to acknowledge.  The Iraqi Health Ministry documented 8,182 child deaths from diarrhea, pneumonia and malnutrition in January, 2000 alone, compared with just 389 deaths in the same month of 1989, the year before the trade embargo went into effect.
“Under the guise of demanding Iraq’s disarmament, the United Nations had succeeded in killing more Iraqi people with its sanctions policy than all the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction ever used in history, combined, according to the prestigious Foreign Affairs Journal.
“A year before President Bush’s inauguration, the senior humanitarian coordinator for the U.N., Hans von Sponeck of Germany, tendered his resignation from the ‘oil for food’ program, calling the Iraq sanctions, ‘a true human tragedy that needs to be ended.
“’We are in the process of destroying an entire society.  It’s as simple and terrifying as that,’ the former assistant Secretary General to the United Nations warned in his resignation.
“The middle class and the professional classes, the very people who might change governance in Iraq, have been wiped out, and those that remain are struggling to stay alive and keep their families alive.
“Some people have wondered how human rights activists, who champion democratic freedoms for all peoples, could oppose a policy tool like sanctions, which on the surface appears to undermine despotic governments.  It’s because we believe, passionately in fact, in the rights of all people to have input to government policy and to speak freely about government decision making, including the right to criticize the government.  The rights of democracy are essential to what we do every day, and we want those rights for all people.
“We oppose sanctions out of recognition that ordinary people have almost no power in those societies.  It seems unfair to punish them for government activities and policies that they cannot possibly hope to change.  Worst still, the extra burden of sanctions has the effect of crushing those people even further.  All of their energies must shift to providing basic necessities for their families.  There’s nothing left to engage in community transformation or political reform movements.  By necessity, their daily life must focus entirely on economic survival.
“Sanctions defeat any hope of real political reforms.
“Alas, the United nations was caught in a macabre steel trap of its own design.  Under its own resolution, sanctions could not be lifted until Iraq proved that it possessed no Weapons of Mass Destruction.
“Iraq, in turn, cried that it had no weapons left to destroy–which the U.S./British invasion verified as tragically accurate.  The United Nations had already destroyed every weapon system in the country before its inspection teams pulled out of Iraq in 1998.
“All those Iraqi people had suffered and died for nothing–1.7 million people died for a lie.”  (Susan Lindauer, “Extreme Prejudice”)

And that was pre-9/11.  Given the realities of what has been done to the people of Iraq, is it any wonder that so many of our soldiers have returned home with damaged souls?  Is it any wonder that so many have taken their own lives?

PURPLE MIND – MUSIC 07/16/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

If we had made our independent feature film, “Purple Mind,” with stars and bank financing, it’s probable that we also would have hired a well known composer like Hans Zimmer or Van Dyke Parks  to handle all the music chores.  As we didn’t have access to any stars (except for Beau Bridges’s daughter Emily) and didn’t have financing to afford a well known composer, we had to rely on a wonderful music library which film &TV music supervisors regularly use for shows.  But music libraries always come up short when it comes to things like main title songs which are typically original compositions.  So, it wasn’t until we began sharing the film with some of our core audience of veterans and peace activists that one of our fans, musician and song writer Pat Scanlon sent us a song called “Young Soldier, Welcome Home.”

01 Young Soldier Welcome Home

Pat is the President of the Boston Chapter of Veterans for Peace, “The Smedley Butler Brigade,” and served in Vietnam in the late sixties.  We thought his song was perfect for the end of our film as it so clearly speaks to issues like PTSD, which is the subject of “Purple Mind.”

If you like Pat’s song, check out the film – “Purple Mind”

PURPLE MIND – ONLY A CLICK AWAY 07/15/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Last night I watched “Act of Valor,” a largely forgettable action film starring real Navy Seals in a story about a Seal unit rescuing an agent and then saving the world from a psychotic terrorist and his minions.  There was, as you might expect, plenty of good action and war stuff – the team parachuting into remote locations, helicopter and drone support, aircraft carriers and submarines with lots of scenes which seemed lifted straight out of a computer game like “America’s Army.”

In a final shoot-out with terrorist about to unleash the unthinkable on America, one of the seals pays the ultimate price, falling on a hand grenade to save his buddies.  His funeral is the last scene of the film, accompanied by a voice-over which suggests what it takes to be a Navy Seal, the key being the ability to take your emotions and feelings and put them in a box and bury it where it will never disturb a Seal’s ability to fight, kill and complete the mission, no matter the odds, no matter the cost.

The trouble with pro-war propaganda films like “Act of Valor” is that the “enemy” is always someone dead set on killing as many Americans as possible in big, splashy terrorist attacks and it is always up to one or two good guys who rescue us poor defenseless civilians at the very last second.  Exciting.  Exciting.  Hero work.

But not the real world.  There is a long line of experts who have dedicated their professional lives to the study of the effects of suppressing our feelings and emotions (putting them in a box and burying it in an unaccessible place).  Wilhelm Reich described the results of this suppression in terms of “body armor.”  Reich and those who came after him, most notably Alexander Lowen (BioEnergetics), studied the human body and its relationship to the mind.  There are volumes dedicated to this research and study.  I am, obviously, leaving out a ton of vital information in this brief peek into the work of Reich and Lowen, but let my brief insight stand as a reference to a door behind which there is a world filled with the promise of Heaven on Earth.

For all our talk of boxes into which feelings and emotions need to be placed in order to protect the world from evil, it is exactly the opposite which is true.  For every painful experience in our lives, from the earliest moments including birth and before, our amazing minds and bodies lock away the pain without our having to ever think about it.  As we continue locking our feelings away, the painful experience is locked away, not in a box, but in cellular memories residing in the muscles affected by the experience.

It shouldn’t be difficult to recall a painful moment – a fight with a spouse, a punishment by a parent, humiliation by a teacher or an employer.  Bring one of these experiences to mind and see if you can recall what your body was feeling – the tension in the face and arms, your stomach, or legs.  These experiences of a lifetime are delivering memories into the very cells of our bodies, head to toe, every minute of our lives.  The more pain and suffering we’ve experienced in our lives, the greater the resulting body armor, and the more body armor we carry, the more the anger there is locked in our bodies, longing to be expressed.

The anger locked in our bodies isn’t restricted to terrorists, folks.  We’ve all got it in varying degrees, depending on what we’ve been through in our lives, and the more we are able to understand how it works and how our lives are affected, the more compassionate we may become – understanding one another more completely and able to lead lives filled with peace.

Our film, “Purple Mind’ is an expression of this understanding.  Next time you’re tempted to watch a pro-war film like “Act of Valor,” I invite you to take a look at a pro-peace film instead.  “Purple Mind” is only a click away.

Watch “Purple Mind”

PURPLE MIND – SOLDIER SUICIDE 07/13/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Our independent film, “Purple Mind,” is about a soldier just returned from the war zone in Iraq.  Every day, I read an article which reflects the difficulties of soldiers dealing with PTSD and TBI, who, too often, fail to find the help they need from the military or VA and wind up taking their own lives.

Today, Rajiv Srinivasan’s article in TIME is another such article.  He writes, “The veteran suicide epidemic is a terrible outcome of multiple years of war. I have personally dealt with the issue having both lost a dear friend to suicide and consoled soldiers during such circumstances and can attest to its devastating impact on the force and the wider community. Soldiers tend to pride ourselves on our ability to care and be cared for by their brothers in arms: it’s a bond seldom replicated in modern American living. So when one of our own decides that his or her life has lost its worth — that living is somehow more terrifying than dying — our entire circle feels an overwhelming failure has come over us. What if I hadn’t skipped out on that last beer? What if I had just said a few more nice things to them? How could I have let this person live without them knowing what they mean to me? The weight of this guilt bears upon us like armor, yet is surely not as easy to take off.”

In response to the shocking number of military suicides, the VA and the military have responded with campaigns aimed at getting soldiers and veterans much needed help, but the efforts have the tone of public service announcements encouraging seniors to get a flu shot, with the result that many do not seek help.

Srinivasan continues, explaining, “Over the course of a soldier or officer’s training, we inculcate in them a vicious and emotional resistance to weakness; a persistence and confidence to overcome any obstacle, even the prospect of fatal combat. We drill into our soldiers the value of obedience and discipline. We teach them to bear their own load as well as their buddies’. On a long and arduous climb up a mountain, it’s hard to be weak when you know your brother or sister is feeding off of your energy. This is the essence of the camaraderie and family that exists between service members in our military, and particularly on the front lines. These are of course among the most esteemed values in our society, yet are also the hardest barriers to break down when a soldier begins to devalue his or her own life.”

Srinivasan goes on to explain that the difficulty in solving the veteran mental health crisis isn’t as much a question of availability of services as it is a question of encouraging soldiers to use the services.  There are many who will dispute the availability of services, however the question of what it will take for a soldier convinced he or she can tough it out to take a risk and seek counseling remains.  Overcoming the stigma of using mental health resources remains a key problem and there is no official policy solution.  What will it take for soldiers and vets to realize the importance of taking mental health personally and seriously?

A key scene toward the end of “Purple Mind” illustrates the difficulties:

DOC:  You tried talkin’ to your wife?

ROY:  You gotta be kidding.

DOC:  No, I’m not kidding.

ROY:  Well she doesn’t want to hear it.  Plus, I’m not real good at talkin’ about it.

DOC:  Talkin’ about what?

ROY:  Talkin’ about shit.

DOC:  No.  Course not.  The Army doesn’t teach that.  It’s not manly.  But it takes a real man to talk about the shit, Roy.

ROY:  So, you really think that talkin’ would do something.

DOC:  I’ll put money on it.

It is almost universally agreed among mental health professionals that talking about the experiences underlying depression and PTSD is one of the most effective therapies in dealing with the “disorder.”  It is the key lesson learned by “Purple Mind’s” central character, Roy Matthews.

“Purple Mind” is available for streaming at http://www.purplemindmovie.com

 

 

PURPLE MIND – THE SUPERMAN MYTH 07/12/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Supermen Save The World

In the major media, more often than not, stories dealing with the consequences of war are hopeful – about the progress the war effort is making or of soldiers who have overcome the loss of arms or legs, double amputees now skiing or running track.  Why, when the numbers of tragic outcomes – including 18 veteran suicides per day and the unprecedented numbers of PTSD cases – are so much greater?  Perhaps it is too simplistic to suggest that because the major media depends on advertiser revenue it can not risk disturbing commerce and those who provide the media’s principal source of income.

When you consider that the biggest blockbuster entertainment of the decade is the “Call of Duty” franchise,  and that “Call of Duty: Black Ops 2” grossed over One Billion Dollars in its first 16 days on the market, a deference to the “job creators” makes perfect sense.  The excitement of life and death computer gaming is BIG BUSINESS.  Not only that, it is also a significant recruiting tool for the U.S. Military.

But what happens when Call of Duty players suddenly enter the war zone?  Sure, it may be a proud patriotic impulse to join up with the prospect of taking the game world to the next level of blowing shit up.  But now, imagine yourself as a soldier newly arrived in Iraq a few years ago.  You’re one of the first to arrive at the scene of the famous “Collateral Murder” site in Iraq.  The first thing you see is a child in a van.  She’s been shot with a 30 mm machine gun round and is laying in a pool of blood and gore next to her father, whose head is half missing.  Suddenly you begin wondering why “Call of Duty” didn’t make you feel like puking your guts the way the reality of war just has.

That’s what our film, “Purple Mind,” is about.  It’s about a soldier who returns home traumatized by the vision of that little girl – to his own family and his own little girl who hasn’t had a father for the past three years and the only way she’s had to try to understand who dad is, has been by playing another popular computer game, “American Soldier.”  Only her dad, just back from Iraq,  isn’t like the soldiers in “American Soldier.”  He’s distant.  He jumps at noises.  And he gets angry easily and far too often.

Why?  Well, after seeing that little girl torn up my 30 mm machine gun rounds, he turned to his lieutenant and asked to see a mental health counselor.  But instead of granting the request, his lieutenant said, “Get the sand out of your vagina.  Suck it up and be a soldier.”

The “Collateral Murder” video is evidence of a military quite different from the honorable military in Call of Duty.  The people killed in the “Collateral Murder” video were unarmed civilians and children.  Bradley Manning released it for the world to see and now faces life in a military prison for revealing the truth of our war in Iraq.  But the “Collateral Murder” video was only one day in the war, and it wasn’t an isolated incident.  It was systemic.  It went on every day, only no one is supposed to know that Superman was really a serial killer.

Today, there are hundreds of thousands of soldiers who haven’t gone to a mental health counselor.  Until they do, instead of returning to the lives they left before the war, they’ll be trying to escape their own memories of an innocent Iraqi boy or girl by withdrawing, watching mindless films, drinking and taking pain killers.  “Nice.”

PURPLE MIND – Chris Hedges reveals the Truth 07/10/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Landfall Productions, Inc..
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

This article by Chris Hedges appeared today, July 10, 2012, in “Information Clearing House” —  As artists and filmmakers struggling to find an audience for our film, “Purple Mind,” on the devastating effects of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, we believe Mr. Hedges has hit a home run with the following:

HOW TO THINK

Cultures that endure carve out a protected space for those who question and challenge national myths. Artists, writers, poets, activists, journalists, philosophers, dancers, musicians, actors, directors and renegades must be tolerated if a culture is to be pulled back from disaster. Members of this intellectual and artistic class, who are usually not welcome in the stultifying halls of academia where mediocrity is triumphant, serve as prophets. They are dismissed, or labeled by the power elites as subversive, because they do not embrace collective self-worship. They force us to confront unexamined assumptions, ones that, if not challenged, lead to destruction. They expose the ruling elites as hollow and corrupt. They articulate the senselessness of a system built on the ideology of endless growth, ceaseless exploitation and constant expansion. They warn us about the poison of careerism and the futility of the search for happiness in the accumulation of wealth. They make us face ourselves, from the bitter reality of slavery and Jim Crow to the genocidal slaughter of Native Americans to the repression of working-class movements to the atrocities carried out in imperial wars to the assault on the ecosystem. They make us unsure of our virtue. They challenge the easy clichés we use to describe the nation—the land of the free, the greatest country on earth, the beacon of liberty—to expose our darkness, crimes and ignorance. They offer the possibility of a life of meaning and the capacity for transformation.

Human societies see what they want to see. They create national myths of identity out of a composite of historical events and fantasy. They ignore unpleasant facts that intrude on self-glorification. They trust naively in the notion of linear progress and in assured national dominance. This is what nationalism is about—lies. And if a culture loses its ability for thought and expression, if it effectively silences dissident voices, if it retreats into what Sigmund Freud called “screen memories,” those reassuring mixtures of fact and fiction, it dies. It surrenders its internal mechanism for puncturing self-delusion. It makes war on beauty and truth. It abolishes the sacred. It turns education into vocational training. It leaves us blind. And this is what has occurred. We are lost at sea in a great tempest. We do not know where we are. We do not know where we are going. And we do not know what is about to happen to us.

The psychoanalyst John Steiner calls this phenomenon “turning a blind eye.” He notes that often we have access to adequate knowledge but because it is unpleasant and disconcerting we choose unconsciously, and sometimes consciously, to ignore it. He uses the Oedipus story to make his point. He argued that Oedipus, Jocasta, Creon and the “blind” Tiresias grasped the truth, that Oedipus had killed his father and married his mother as prophesized, but they colluded to ignore it. We too, Steiner wrote, turn a blind eye to the dangers that confront us, despite the plethora of evidence that if we do not radically reconfigure our relationships to each other and the natural world, catastrophe is assured. Steiner describes a psychological truth that is deeply frightening.

I saw this collective capacity for self-delusion among the urban elites in Sarajevo and later Pristina during the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo. These educated elites steadfastly refused to believe that war was possible although acts of violence by competing armed bands had already begun to tear at the social fabric. At night you could hear gunfire. But they were the last to “know.” And we are equally self-deluded. The physical evidence of national decay—the crumbling infrastructures, the abandoned factories and other workplaces, the rows of gutted warehouses, the closure of libraries, schools, fire stations and post offices—that we physically see, is, in fact, unseen. The rapid and terrifying deterioration of the ecosystem, evidenced in soaring temperatures, droughts, floods, crop destruction, freak storms, melting ice caps and rising sea levels, are met blankly with Steiner’s “blind eye.”

Oedipus, at the end of Sophocles’ play, cuts out his eyes and with his daughter Antigone as a guide wanders the countryside. Once king, he becomes a stranger in a strange country. He dies, in Antigone’s words, “in a foreign land, but one he yearned for.”

William Shakespeare in “King Lear” plays on the same theme of sight and sightlessness. Those with eyes in “King Lear” are unable to see. Gloucester, whose eyes are gouged out, finds in his blindness a revealed truth. “I have no way, and therefore want no eyes,” Gloucester says after he is blinded. “I stumbled when I saw.” When Lear banishes his only loyal daughter, Cordelia, whom he accuses of not loving him enough, he shouts: “Out of my sight!” To which Kent replies:

See better, Lear, and let me still remain
The true blank of thine eye.

The story of Lear, like the story of Oedipus, is about the attainment of this inner vision. It is about morality and intellect that are blinded by empiricism and sight. It is about understanding that the human imagination is, as William Blake saw, our manifestation of Eternity. “Love without imagination is eternal death.”

The Shakespearean scholar Harold Goddard wrote: “The imagination is not a faculty for the creation of illusion; it is the faculty by which alone man apprehends reality. The ‘illusion’ turns out to be truth.” “Let faith oust fact,” Starbuck says in “Moby-Dick.”

“It is only our absurd ‘scientific’ prejudice that reality must be physical and rational that blinds us to the truth,” Goddard warned. There are, as Shakespeare wrote, “things invisible to mortal sight.” But these things are not vocational or factual or empirical. They are not found in national myths of glory and power. They are not attained by force. They do not come through cognition or logical reasoning. They are intangible. They are the realities of beauty, grief, love, the search for meaning, the struggle to face our own mortality and the ability to face truth. And cultures that disregard these forces of imagination commit suicide. They cannot see.

“How with this rage shall beauty hold a plea,” Shakespeare wrote, “Whose action is no stronger than a flower?” Human imagination, the capacity to have vision, to build a life of meaning rather than utilitarianism, is as delicate as a flower. And if it is crushed, if a Shakespeare or a Sophocles is no longer deemed useful in the empirical world of business, careerism and corporate power, if universities think a Milton Friedman or a Friedrich Hayek is more important to its students than a Virginia Woolf or an Anton Chekhov, then we become barbarians. We assure our own extinction. Students who are denied the wisdom of the great oracles of human civilization—visionaries who urge us not to worship ourselves, not to kneel before the base human emotion of greed—cannot be educated. They cannot think.

To think, we must, as Epicurus understood, “live in hiding.” We must build walls to keep out the cant and noise of the crowd. We must retreat into a print-based culture where ideas are not deformed into sound bites and thought-terminating clichés. Thinking is, as Hannah Arendt wrote, “a soundless dialogue between me and myself.” But thinking, she wrote, always presupposes the human condition of plurality. It has no utilitarian function. It is not an end or an aim outside of itself. It is different from logical reasoning, which is focused on a finite and identifiable goal. Logical reason, acts of cognition, serve the efficiency of a system, including corporate power, which is usually morally neutral at best, and often evil. The inability to think, Arendt wrote, “is not a failing of the many who lack brain power but an ever-present possibility for everybody—scientists, scholars, and other specialists in mental enterprises not excluded.”

Our corporate culture has effectively severed us from human imagination. Our electronic devices intrude deeper and deeper into spaces that were once reserved for solitude, reflection and privacy. Our airwaves are filled with the tawdry and the absurd. Our systems of education and communication scorn the disciplines that allow us to see. We celebrate prosaic vocational skills and the ridiculous requirements of standardized tests. We have tossed those who think, including many teachers of the humanities, into a wilderness where they cannot find employment, remuneration or a voice. We follow the blind over the cliff. We make war on ourselves.

The vital importance of thought, Arendt wrote, is apparent only “in times of transition when men no longer rely on the stability of the world and their role in it, and when the question concerning the general conditions of human life, which as such are properly coeval with the appearance of man on earth, gain an uncommon poignancy.” We never need our thinkers and artists more than in times of crisis, as Arendt reminds us, for they provide the subversive narratives that allow us to chart a new course, one that can assure our survival.

“What must I do to win salvation?” Dimitri asks Starov in “The Brothers Karamazov,” to which Starov answers: “Above all else, never lie to yourself.”

And here is the dilemma we face as a civilization. We march collectively toward self-annihilation. Corporate capitalism, if left unchecked, will kill us. Yet we refuse, because we cannot think and no longer listen to those who do think, to see what is about to happen to us. We have created entertaining mechanisms to obscure and silence the harsh truths, from climate change to the collapse of globalization to our enslavement to corporate power, that will mean our self-destruction. If we can do nothing else we must, even as individuals, nurture the private dialogue and the solitude that make thought possible. It is better to be an outcast, a stranger in one’s own country, than an outcast from one’s self. It is better to see what is about to befall us and to resist than to retreat into the fantasies embraced by a nation of the blind.

Chris Hedges, whose column is published Mondays on Truthdig, spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas Morning News and The New York Times, for which he was a foreign correspondent for 15 years

This this article was first published at Truth Dig

PTSD I HATE YOU 07/06/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Dear PTSD,

Before you came into my life, I had heard rumors. Back then, no one really spoke about you unless it was in hushed whispers. No one knew for sure what you looked like- but I heard you did unspeakable things… that you crept into bed with husbands and seduced them away from their unsuspecting wives. I also heard that you drank. A lot. I heard sometimes you could be two places at once- physically in one place but mentally elsewhere. It was also said that you were a liar, home wrecker, careless and violent… that sometimes you would take your mounting anger out on walls or whatever or whomever happened to get in your way. You left shattered picture frames and broken memories in your wake. There have been songs written about you… yet they don’t even begin to do justice to just how evil you are. In fact, there has been talk of you being a murderer. I can’t say that I’m surprised. I wouldn’t put it past you. I believed those rumors and I certainly never invited you into my life.

But you came anyway.

And you were relentless.

It was four and a half years ago when you crept into our lives- an unwelcome guest. I’m not sure if you were in his med (medical) bag on the plane or if you quietly crept in through an open window one night making him awake in a state of panic… but once you came, no matter how much I begged and pleaded, you just kept finding ways back into our life. Persistent. I still can’t believe the cops were never called when you would be banging down the door just to prove you were still there, still providing him the thrilling “alive” feeling I couldn’t… At first you were just a nuisance… doing stupid things like ruining our sleep and tracking your sandy footprints all over our home, leaving shattered glasses, like a disrespectful child never cleaning up after yourself… leaving your mark to let us know you were still there…then you started turning up and interfering with his job. Distracting. Leaving us on edge…but you proved to be a stealth, well-trained machine… incognito even. We knew you were there but no one else admitted to seeing you- some might say you were a ghost of sorts. Eventually, we thought maybe they were right- that maybe you weren’t there to stay…. So we tried so many times to go on pretending we had moved on… but you are like the ex we avoided yet managed to bump into on the fourth of July at the fireworks, causing him to hide under the nearest table so you don’t see him and have to wax nostalgia about all of your memories. Those trips down memory lane were always too much to handle anyway.

But we were wrong. And you were angry. Angry that we wished you away or that we ignored you – I’m still not sure which but you sure let us know it. Quite the elaborate production. You make quite a scene, don’t you? You followed us everywhere we went. Proof of your existence began popping up everywhere but, like us, others knew of your bad reputation and hanging out with you started to get him into trouble at work… and then at home… You once left a hole in the wall at the top of the stairs…and I read the elicit text messages between the two of you… you sure were proving all the rumors true.
The last straw was when you began attacking me for trying to pull him away from your allure… your antidepressant induced numbness … All I wanted was to go back to being a couple but everyone knows, PTSD, you’re a dirty, dirty whore. You weren’t ready to let go yet. You had greater plans… the ultimate sacrifice was number one on your list. You wanted his life. And you tried to take it. You probably would have won if I conceded defeat that day but, unlike you, using him for whatever thrill… I love him. So I saved his life. I’d heard you’d been violent before, or in instances like ours, cowardly, disguising yourself as miracle pills that would end the suffering you’ve caused. Some might say you are the snake to Adam and Eve. Even the experts trained to recognize you, they were so afraid of you and the implications of your existence that they concocted an elaborate cover up and sent us on our way. Maybe you are just bloody brilliant.

I’ve been reading in the news lately about how good you’ve gotten at tricking the military into believing you aren’t real and I gotta say, I’m impressed. But I’m not buying it. At all.

I’ve been talking about you, PTSD, and I have about had it with you in my life. The few bruises, the tears, the fear, the insecurity, anxiety, infidelity, deceit and the broken heart…. I’m over it and I want my husband back. I bet you feel real big… that uneasy feeling you leave in the pit of my stomach never goes away anymore. Empty promises don’t ease my pain. You have even stooped so low as to bring my children into your little shenanigans and that is just crossing the line. They aren’t babies like they were when we first met. They’re perceptive. They’ve witnessed our arguments. They’ve seen how terrible you are to me but I’m strong. I’m a fighter and when it comes to my children, I always show them that…but you’re expertly trained and certainly know how to subdue your victim until they concede defeat.
This time is different, though. You have me so close to waving the white flag to protect my children… but I know once you put the pen in my hand to sign away the relationship I committed to, you will only find another home to ruin. It is for that reason that I will let you win this round. I walked away… No, I ran. In fact I fled. Hundreds of miles. Too tired to fight… but I’m regrouping. Preparing. Training. Filling my arsenal. More focused and driven than before. I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase that Hell hath no fury like that of a woman scorned. If you won’t go quietly into the night and leave my family be, you need to know I’ll never give up. And when you come at me again, I’ll be prepared. This time I have a ton of women who have my back. We will tell everyone what you do. I won’t let you have him. I want him back. And I don’t care if you have to rot in hell but you will lose. I hope you’re ready. PTSD, I hate you…

Sincerely,
Heather Goble,
-wife of HM2 FMF Justin Goble
United States Navy 2003-pending PEB

From Businessinsider.com (7/6/12)

WAR IS A RACKET 07/06/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

“WAR IS A RACKET.  IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN.”  Major General Smedley D. Butler, 1935

Here is a bit of background on why we decided to make our independent feature film, “Purple Mind,” and why it might be worthwhile to forgo “Housewives of Beverly Hills” for an evening in favor of more thoughtful “entertainment.”

Purple Mind” explores the post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) suffered by one soldier, whose fictional experience mirrors that of many  U.S. soldiers, particularly those who took part in operations such as the Battle of Fallujia.  To better understand the cost in lives and human suffering involved in the Iraq War, we offer the following chronology of events and decisions made by the Bush Administration as documented in Charles Ferguson’s Academy Award nominated 2007 film, “No End In Sight.”

May 1, 2003 – President Bush declared an end to major combat missions in Iraq.  By May, 2007, Iraq had disintegrated into chaos.  Many Iraqis no longer had access to clean water, sewage facilities and electricity.  Bagdad had been under an 8 pm curfew since 2006.  Over 3 million Iraqis had fled to neighboring countries.  Estimates of civilian deaths ranged as high as 600,000.  How did it happen?

From the beginning, George W. Bush’s foreign policy inner circle, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz set the Administration on course for war with Iraq.

January 20th, 2003 – President Bush signed NSPD-24 (National Security Presidential Directive 24), which gave control of postwar Iraq to the Pentagon.  That document made Donald Rumsfeld the Commander in Chief of the US Military.

On March 19, 2003, President Bush framed the invasion of Iraq as a humanitarian effort “to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.”

April 9, 2003 – The US had overpowered Sadam Hussein and taken Bagdad.  US Marines recall that there had not been any plan on what to do next.  Many thought they would be returning home within a matter of weeks.

During the month following the fall of Iraq, the US did nothing to control massive looting.  Hospitals, universities, ministries…  One CPA estimated the cost of the looting at 12 billion dollars.

Many Iraqis believed that US commanders encouraged the looting if only by allowing it to happen.  Both Sunnis and Shi’a were outraged.

The Department of Justice made recommendations – based on previous peace operations – that US forces were likely to encounter massive civil disturbances and suggested they needed 2,500 constabulary forces, 4,000 street cops and teams of judicial advisors and corrections officers.

In mid-April, 2003  – with looting still underway – Rumsfeld canceled deployment of the 1st Calvary Division, a force of 16,000 soldiers which could have helped stabilize the country.

US forces did not act as police.  They didn’t know the streets of Bagdad.  They didn’t speak the language.  They didn’t have interpreters in sufficient numbers.  They had no intelligence.  The result was a free-for-all.

Donald Rumsfeld advised General Jay Garner, who was in charge of the Iraq forces, that the President had appointed L. Paul “Jerry” Bremer as the Presidential Envoy to Iraq.   Bremer spoke no Arabic and had no prior experience with the mid-east and had never served in the military.

For the ten days preceding his arrival in Bagdad, Bremer worked closely with Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz establishing a plan of action.  The plan consisted of three major decisions:

1.  Stop the formation of an interim Iraqi government – even though General Jay Garner had been working to establish one.  The understanding was that Bremer was in charge and no one else had the authority to even question his policy decisions… decisions which excluded the Iraqis from any role in governing the country,  and treating the Iraqi people, who had at first welcomed US forces, as the enemy.

2.  Bremer’s second decision was to purge approx. 50,000 members of the Ba’ath Party which Sadam had used to rule Iraq.  For most, Bremer’s order meant Ba’ath Party members would become permanently unemployed.  The policy also crippled Iraq’s government, educational system and economy.  Many senior government officials had joined the party simply to survive under Sadam’s regime.      The result?  Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis demonstrated, demanding jobs… engineers, managers, technocrats, librarians, the intelligentsia.  A peaceful population became jobless and were humiliated.

3.  Bremer’s third decision was to disband the Iraqi military and intelligence services.  Overnight, Bremer rendered unemployed and infuriated over half a million ARMED MEN.  As a result, the men who could have prevented an insurgency, CREATED ONE.  Former soldiers demonstrated.  Hundreds of thousands of families suddenly had no income, no providers.  People couldn’t buy food and went hungry.

Five days after Bremer’s plans were announced, General Jay Garner was sent home.  The same day, the Iraq insurgency began with two US soldiers killed in an attack on their Humvees just outside the Green Zone.

There were 70 large weapons storage depots and many more unguarded ammunition dumps in Iraq and not enough American troops to guard them.  The disenfranchised Iraq military all knew where the weapons and munitions were stored.   For several months after U.S. took Bagdad and combat actions ended, the depots were left unsecured.  Alarmed observers noted that Iraqi men were loading trucks with guns and explosives but when they advised US commanders, they were told “we just don’t have enough people to deal with it.”

Senior Iraqi generals went to UN Headquarters at the Canal Hotel in Bagdad to advise that letting Bremer’s order stand to marginalize the Iraqi military would create an insurgency.  They were ignored and the insurgency grew.

Most alarming of all was that Bremer’s decision had been made in secret by three men, not in Iraq but in Washington… three men who had never been to Iraq… men who did not consult their military commanders in Iraq, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the State Department, the CIA, The National Security Council or even, apparently, the President of the United States…. the three were Cheney, Rumsfelt & Wolfowitz.

By July 2003, insurgents began planting improvised explosive devices [IEDs] all over Iraq.  There was a dramatic rise in casualty rates among American soldiers suddenly engaged in a war created by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolowitz.

On July 2, 2003, President Bush said, “There are some who feel like the conditions are such that they can attack us there [Iraq].  My answer is Bring Em On.”

In the four crucial months after the fall of Bagdad, the two main things the US military was doing on the ground were:  1) looking for WMD supplies and 2) looking for Sadam Hussein.  The process of those searches – busting in doors at night, rounding up people, taking them to Abu Ghraib, and making mass arrests – resulted only in further embittering the Iraqi people.

Military age Iraqis became a prime target for arrest as suspected insurgents.  Taking men away from their families eliminated their bread winners, angering not just the men but their extended families because each was probably supporting more than his immediate family.

To counter attacks on US soldiers, U.S. patrols concentrated on finding the insurgents.  The efforts resulted in occasionally arresting or killing the wrong person.  Once an insurgent was arrested, they tended to disappear in the American military prison system for a long time without a trace.  Families could get no word of them or their condition.

American troops typically tried to “do the right thing,” but when their brothers and sisters were being killed and maimed, soldiers first thoughts are about survival and the reasons behind the war were invisible to most.  On the other side, people who had had good reason to hate Sadam Hussein now had even more compelling reason to hate Americans.

By early 2004 FALLUJAH (Pop. 350,000) west of Bagdad had become the center of the Sunni insurgency.

March 31, 2004 – Four American military contractors (Blackwater mercinaries) were killed and their bodies dragged through the streets by cheering crowds – before being hung from a bridge.

November, 2004 the Pentagon decided to attack Fallujah to “recapture” the city from the Sunni insurgents.  Residents were warned to leave.  The following battle destroyed 70% of the city, leaving 150,000 homeless.  Many insurgents “escaped.”  Forty Marines were killed.

The day after Republicans lost control of Congress, President Bush announced Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld’s resignation.  Bush replaced him with Robert Gates, saying, “I am replacing the Secretary of Defense to bring a fresh perspective as to how to achieve something I think most Americans want, which is a victory.”

By the time Rumsfeld was replaced, Iraq was completely out of control, dominated by militias, insurgents, criminals and warlords.  Mixed areas were purged by ethnic cleansing.  Shi’a militias infiltrated the police, using the cover for sectarian killings.  Kidnapping and violent deaths reached several hundred per day.

THE COST OF WAR:  As of early 2007, the direct costs of the Iraq war reached $380 billion; future operating costs were estimated at $390 billion; veterans’ health care and lost productivity were projected to be $482 billion; demobilization and replacing military equipment was estimated at $160 billion; increases in oil prices due to the war were projected at $450 billion…  TOTAL: $1.86 TRILLION (2007).

Linda Bilmes, of the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University said, “The big, big cost in terms of Veterans disabilities is for the many hundreds of thousands of soldiers who come back and they find that they can’t work and hold down a job the way they used to because they’re just not quite the same as they were before.”

General Jay Garner, when asked why he thought all the mistakes of the Iraq war occurred, said, “I don’t know.  It’s puzzling.”

“It’s puzzling?”  Is that enough?  Does “it’s puzzling” help when your son or daughter, your husband or father is killed or comes home a shell of the person he or she once was?

On several occasions, including his 2006 State of the Union address, President Bush expressed his concern for Iraq in the following words, “We will bring to the Iraqi people food, and medicines, and supplies, and freedom.”

Is Freedom What Operation Iraqi Freedom Was All About?

On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld revealed at a press conference that, “According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions.” (DOD)   An interesting coincidence occurred the following day during the attacks of 9/11.  The “passenger jet” which hit the Pentagon destroyed the Army Budget Office where thirty-eight Army employees were attempting to track the missing trillions. (Col. Paul Hughes, Dir. Strategic Policy for US Occupation, 2003).

“It’s puzzling.”  Really?

In his documentary film “Fahrenheit 911,” Michael Moore makes nine allegations concerning the Carlyle Group, the 11th largest defense contractor in the U.S., including: That the Bin Laden and Bush families were both connected to the Group; that following the attacks on September 11, the Bin Laden family’s investments in the Carlyle Group became an embarrassment to the Carlyle Group and the family was forced to liquidate their assets with the firm.  Moore focused on Carlyle’s connections with George H. W. Bush and his Secretary of State James A. Baker III, both of whom had at times served as advisors to the firm.

Whatever one thinks of the morality or necessity of the war in Iraq, one thing is undeniable: many well-placed companies made billions of dollars off the war, including Halliburton, General Electric, Boeing, Motorola and others.” Two companies with close ties to the Bush and Cheney families that reaped huge profits are the Halliburton Company and the Carlyle Group.

LA TIMES – “Pentagon officials have acknowledged that Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff and other Bush administration political appointees were involved in a controversial decision to pay Halliburton Inc. to plan for the postwar recovery of Iraq’s oil sector, a Democratic lawmaker said yesterday. The decision, overruling the recommendations of an Army lawyer, eventually resulted in the award of a $7 billion no-bid contract to Halliburton, which Cheney ran for five years before he was nominated for vice president.”

OLIVER MORGAN, OBSERVER – “Halliburton, the engineering group formerly run by US vice-president Dick Cheney, has been given $1 billion worth of reconstruction work in Iraq by the US government without having to compete for it, thanks to repeated delays in opening up a key contract to competition.  12/03

Interesting Dick Cheney Facts:

–  Cheney served as Secretary of Defense from 1989 to 1993

In January, 1993, Cheney left the Department of Defense and joined the American Enterprise Institute.  From 1995 until 2000, he served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Halliburton, a Fortune 500 company and market leader in the energy sector.

– Cheney’s 2000 income from Halliburton: $36,086,635

– Increase in government contracts while Cheney led Halliburton: 91%

– Minimum size of “accounting irregularity” that occurred while Cheney was CEO: $100,000,000

– Pages of energy plan documents Cheney refused to give Congressional investigators: 13,500

– Amount energy companies gave the Bush/Cheney presidential campaign: $1,800,000

VICTOR THORN, BABEL MAGAZINE – “A few weeks ago, James Baker publicly offered advice to the Bush Administration on how they should proceed with their war on Iraq. What he and every newscaster or commentator failed to mention was that Baker is now employed by the highly-influential Carlyle Group, which is the eleventh largest defense contractor in the United States. . . If you’re not familiar with them, the Carlyle Group has become a powerhouse in affecting the direction in which our foreign policy takes, especially in regard to war. They accomplish this by hiring former government officials, then investing in private companies that are subject to government change.”

WAR IS A RACKET   —  “That’s not what I signed up for.”  Cpl. Roy Matthews in “Purple Mind.”

PTSD & 4th of July 07/04/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Happy Fourth from Landfall, but please don’t forget the vets who may not enjoy the fireworks.

Bill Brigs writes in U.S. News, “Explosive bursts somewhere in the night – somewhere close – send Marine veteran Pete Chinnici lunging to his feet and scurrying outside, heart racing, chest heaving. His instinctive mission: track, identify and “eliminate the threat.”  To Chinnici, 26, who served two tours in Iraq and has since dealt with a mild case of post-traumatic stress disorder, the loud, staccato pops can sound much like a machine gun.  “I instantly want to know,” he said, “where the sound is coming from so I can understand what I’m up against.”  Throughout that brief, chilling moment, Chinnici knows intellectually that he’s prowling his own yard in Phoenix. Emotionally and instinctively, however, he’s been momentarily yanked backward in time to an unfriendly, unpredictable, violent land. The trigger: kids playing with firecrackers.  As the nation’s birthday looms – and, most definitely, on July 4 – an unknown number of combat veterans, including active and retired soldiers diagnosed PTSD or not, will cringe, flinch and feel anxious as the crackle of fireworks sporadically fills their American neighborhoods, towns and cities. The annual celebration of freedom has, for many warriors, become one of the worst days of the year.”

Here is a scene from an earlier version of our indie feature, “Purple Mind,” with Emily Bridges, Will Shepherd and Brighid Fleming which illustrates the above article.

VOICE OF ART 06/30/2012

Posted by landfallprods in Purple Mind.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

More from IVAW…